<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joel Chandler Harris Was a Bastard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/</link>
	<description>This Nation&#039;s Most Exciting House Museum Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:44:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10875</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10875</guid>
		<description>Interesting post(s)... I wish I remembered whom it was who told me that &quot;treating others as you would like to be treated&quot; is not as important as &quot;treating others as THEY would like to be treated.&quot;

My initial reaction to such a rule was puzzlement over how I was supposed to know how other people wanted to be treated if I didnt even know them (!?!). 

Lain, you find yourself in an interesting situation, not only speaking to large groups of people, but having important and controversial information to convey (this is just one issue amoung many).

Obviously it&#039;s important to get the point across, otherwise it would be an injustice to many of the things that need to be told. By the law of large numbers, chances are that people will get offended from time to time.

I did not really address the &quot;bastard&quot; issue, because I&#039;m not sure of the best way to handle it, even after reading all those posts. Perhaps putting things in context of what the views were at the time, and using the word &quot;illegitimate&quot; would be a decent practice though.

I guess that, even though there are a number of contoversial topics, some are easier to joke about than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post(s)&#8230; I wish I remembered whom it was who told me that &#8220;treating others as you would like to be treated&#8221; is not as important as &#8220;treating others as THEY would like to be treated.&#8221;</p>
<p>My initial reaction to such a rule was puzzlement over how I was supposed to know how other people wanted to be treated if I didnt even know them (!?!). </p>
<p>Lain, you find yourself in an interesting situation, not only speaking to large groups of people, but having important and controversial information to convey (this is just one issue amoung many).</p>
<p>Obviously it&#8217;s important to get the point across, otherwise it would be an injustice to many of the things that need to be told. By the law of large numbers, chances are that people will get offended from time to time.</p>
<p>I did not really address the &#8220;bastard&#8221; issue, because I&#8217;m not sure of the best way to handle it, even after reading all those posts. Perhaps putting things in context of what the views were at the time, and using the word &#8220;illegitimate&#8221; would be a decent practice though.</p>
<p>I guess that, even though there are a number of contoversial topics, some are easier to joke about than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A fan and supporter of the museum</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10728</link>
		<dc:creator>A fan and supporter of the museum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10728</guid>
		<description>I left a comment a couple of days ago - and I too was born in &quot;the 80&#039;s&quot; and still see something disgusting and annoying with that word. So I don&#039;t think it matters what age one is...

Anyhow, I&#039;m glad you see what some of us mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left a comment a couple of days ago &#8211; and I too was born in &#8220;the 80&#8217;s&#8221; and still see something disgusting and annoying with that word. So I don&#8217;t think it matters what age one is&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyhow, I&#8217;m glad you see what some of us mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lain</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10578</link>
		<dc:creator>lain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10578</guid>
		<description>These are all terribly valid and valuable points, and I think they demonstrate (1) that Marshall is exactly right, and we shouldn&#039;t underestimate the power of words and that (2) a lot of folks have very personal connotations and relationships with the word in question.

I also think that there&#039;s a bit of a age disconnect here.  I don&#039;t know if anyone is with me on this one, but having been born in the 80s mostly I think of the word as a minor insult (or swear word) or a punchline in movies.  Clearly that isn&#039;t the case with everyone.  

I&#039;m of the opinion that &quot;illegitimate&quot; is just as bad as &quot;bastard&quot; simply because the word actually spells everything out.  It&#039;s weird to think about how &quot;illegitimate child&quot; is thrown around so freely when it&#039;s such a harsh judgment call on a person that had nothing to do with their position in life.

Finally, I just want to stress that adding a touch of humor to the situation is not merely pointing at Joel Chandler Harris and going HA!  HA!  I think it&#039;s more in line with the tone of Harris&#039; writing (and the tone of this blog) to temper very serious subjects with a little humor.  After all, the Br&#039;er Rabbit stories did just that--replace the Critters with the slaves themselves, and all of a sudden things aren&#039;t so funny. 

That said, I&#039;ll certainly be more careful with what I say (and who I say it to!) in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all terribly valid and valuable points, and I think they demonstrate (1) that Marshall is exactly right, and we shouldn&#8217;t underestimate the power of words and that (2) a lot of folks have very personal connotations and relationships with the word in question.</p>
<p>I also think that there&#8217;s a bit of a age disconnect here.  I don&#8217;t know if anyone is with me on this one, but having been born in the 80s mostly I think of the word as a minor insult (or swear word) or a punchline in movies.  Clearly that isn&#8217;t the case with everyone.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that &#8220;illegitimate&#8221; is just as bad as &#8220;bastard&#8221; simply because the word actually spells everything out.  It&#8217;s weird to think about how &#8220;illegitimate child&#8221; is thrown around so freely when it&#8217;s such a harsh judgment call on a person that had nothing to do with their position in life.</p>
<p>Finally, I just want to stress that adding a touch of humor to the situation is not merely pointing at Joel Chandler Harris and going HA!  HA!  I think it&#8217;s more in line with the tone of Harris&#8217; writing (and the tone of this blog) to temper very serious subjects with a little humor.  After all, the Br&#8217;er Rabbit stories did just that&#8211;replace the Critters with the slaves themselves, and all of a sudden things aren&#8217;t so funny. </p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ll certainly be more careful with what I say (and who I say it to!) in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ida Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10539</link>
		<dc:creator>Ida Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10539</guid>
		<description>When my Dad was 82, the year before he died. A cousin and I were discussing tthe family tree with him and tears started down his cheeks and he said he wished I would never have to know , but his grandfather was a bastard and we were the bastard line of the family. i told him &#039;Oh Daddy no one cares about that anymore&quot;, but it had meant a terribly lot to him.

I don&#039;t think making a joke of a good man who we should all be proud of is funny. I&#039;m sure it wasn&#039;t funny to him. 

I&#039;m just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my Dad was 82, the year before he died. A cousin and I were discussing tthe family tree with him and tears started down his cheeks and he said he wished I would never have to know , but his grandfather was a bastard and we were the bastard line of the family. i told him &#8216;Oh Daddy no one cares about that anymore&#8221;, but it had meant a terribly lot to him.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think making a joke of a good man who we should all be proud of is funny. I&#8217;m sure it wasn&#8217;t funny to him. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10430</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10430</guid>
		<description>Words are very powerful. To be called a bastard and the social stigma it carried in my youth the 50&#039;s and 60&#039;s was demeaning if not the ultimate insult and put down in society. Therefore with all the power vested in the board chairmanship by fiat I  declare that he can not be be called a (b_ _ _ _ _d) in his own home. On the outside  and in the rest of the world these terms may be used with discretion and literary license. However, be alerted your comments may be U-Tubed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words are very powerful. To be called a bastard and the social stigma it carried in my youth the 50&#8217;s and 60&#8217;s was demeaning if not the ultimate insult and put down in society. Therefore with all the power vested in the board chairmanship by fiat I  declare that he can not be be called a (b_ _ _ _ _d) in his own home. On the outside  and in the rest of the world these terms may be used with discretion and literary license. However, be alerted your comments may be U-Tubed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10393</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10393</guid>
		<description>I disagree with David in that I think saying illegitimate is fine. Single parant family is wrong, because it doesn&#039;t convey the strong social stigma that was attached to being born out of wedlock at that time (and personally, I think the world might be a bit of a better place if people still had that attitude a little). Bastard does.  Perhaps if it goes over well with groups, continue using it there. But not at the house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with David in that I think saying illegitimate is fine. Single parant family is wrong, because it doesn&#8217;t convey the strong social stigma that was attached to being born out of wedlock at that time (and personally, I think the world might be a bit of a better place if people still had that attitude a little). Bastard does.  Perhaps if it goes over well with groups, continue using it there. But not at the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10361</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10361</guid>
		<description>Lain, you failed the pre-cottillion class too?

I think your humorous intent is probably pretty clear in most instances, but yes, you should probably give second thought to using the phrase &#039;bastard&#039; or  &#039;illegitimate&#039;, and coordinate it with the modern description of &#039;single parent family&#039;.  It still sounds like a good way to start talking about his life!  Also, well done on using the term &#039;tar baby&#039; so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lain, you failed the pre-cottillion class too?</p>
<p>I think your humorous intent is probably pretty clear in most instances, but yes, you should probably give second thought to using the phrase &#8216;bastard&#8217; or  &#8216;illegitimate&#8217;, and coordinate it with the modern description of &#8217;single parent family&#8217;.  It still sounds like a good way to start talking about his life!  Also, well done on using the term &#8216;tar baby&#8217; so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lain</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10351</link>
		<dc:creator>lain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10351</guid>
		<description>Great comments so far.

And please, don&#039;t be shy! I posted this not because I was indignant, but because I was curious about your reactions--before yesterday I&#039;d never heard anyone voice their opinion like that on this matter.

Ida Beth, I certainly don&#039;t say it to 6-year olds.  Since I don&#039;t normally give tours, the time I usually bring it up is when I&#039;m speaking to Rotary Clubs or Garden Clubs or Daughters of the Confederacy Clubs or whatever.  That is the instance where I use it for (and it continually gets) laughs.

Susan, I should have clarified, but in this particular context I wasn&#039;t joking around.  My point in this case was that Joel Chandler Harris succeeded not despite, but perhaps because of the fact that he was an illegitimate child of Irish descent with (worst of all!) red hair in the 19th century.  His somewhat painful upbringing allowed for him to eventually find a connection with the population of slaves on the plantation.  Some of the slaves took on paternal roles in his life, something that wouldn&#039;t have been possible otherwise and greatly influenced his career as a journalist and as an author.

I&#039;ve got to agree with Bryan on the matter of etiquette.  As frequent blog readers have no doubt come to understand, the staff of the Wren&#039;s Nest under the age of 25 is a lot of things, but classy ain&#039;t one of &#039;em.  Clearly, I have failed whomever it was that led that pre-cottillion class in 6th grade, and I&#039;ve come to terms with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments so far.</p>
<p>And please, don&#8217;t be shy! I posted this not because I was indignant, but because I was curious about your reactions&#8211;before yesterday I&#8217;d never heard anyone voice their opinion like that on this matter.</p>
<p>Ida Beth, I certainly don&#8217;t say it to 6-year olds.  Since I don&#8217;t normally give tours, the time I usually bring it up is when I&#8217;m speaking to Rotary Clubs or Garden Clubs or Daughters of the Confederacy Clubs or whatever.  That is the instance where I use it for (and it continually gets) laughs.</p>
<p>Susan, I should have clarified, but in this particular context I wasn&#8217;t joking around.  My point in this case was that Joel Chandler Harris succeeded not despite, but perhaps because of the fact that he was an illegitimate child of Irish descent with (worst of all!) red hair in the 19th century.  His somewhat painful upbringing allowed for him to eventually find a connection with the population of slaves on the plantation.  Some of the slaves took on paternal roles in his life, something that wouldn&#8217;t have been possible otherwise and greatly influenced his career as a journalist and as an author.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree with Bryan on the matter of etiquette.  As frequent blog readers have no doubt come to understand, the staff of the Wren&#8217;s Nest under the age of 25 is a lot of things, but classy ain&#8217;t one of &#8216;em.  Clearly, I have failed whomever it was that led that pre-cottillion class in 6th grade, and I&#8217;ve come to terms with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10350</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10350</guid>
		<description>I say, to heck with &quot;classy.&quot; But if etiquette is about helping people get along better, I&#039;m for that.

Lain, it seems like, on the subject of JCH&#039;s parents, you might also come upon the occasion of using the f-word. And it might be accurate, and might convey the intensity, and might be funny. But you&#039;d hesitate, right? And not just because some classify it as &quot;slang.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say, to heck with &#8220;classy.&#8221; But if etiquette is about helping people get along better, I&#8217;m for that.</p>
<p>Lain, it seems like, on the subject of JCH&#8217;s parents, you might also come upon the occasion of using the f-word. And it might be accurate, and might convey the intensity, and might be funny. But you&#8217;d hesitate, right? And not just because some classify it as &#8220;slang.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A fan and supporter of the museum</title>
		<link>http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-10349</link>
		<dc:creator>A fan and supporter of the museum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrensnestonline.com/blog/joel-chandler-harris-was-a-bastard/#comment-10349</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should go to etiquette school, that way you can talk about him being a &#039;bastard&#039; in a, oh I don&#039;t know... more classier way?

Just my thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should go to etiquette school, that way you can talk about him being a &#8216;bastard&#8217; in a, oh I don&#8217;t know&#8230; more classier way?</p>
<p>Just my thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
